Skip to content
Aminoscope
Head-to-head

LGD-4033 vs Ostarine

The two SARMs with genuine human trials, asking different questions: three weeks of dosing in healthy men, against two completed phase 3 programs in patients.

By Julian RothResearch & dataUpdated October 2026

Short answer

With human clinical data on both sides, LGD-4033 and Ostarine differ mainly in what they are for. LGD-4033 is marketed for oral muscle building without steroids; Ostarine is the choice for readers interested in muscle growth, recomposition and muscle preservation while cutting or on a GLP-1. Both are sold gray-market as research chemicals.

LGD-4033

Ligandrol, VK5211, Anabolicum

Clinical data

The best-studied consumer SARM, and the data says what buyers don't expect: +1.21 kg lean mass in 21 days with no strength gain, alongside a 39% HDL drop and dose-dependent testosterone suppression.

Full LGD-4033 evidence review

Ostarine

Enobosarm, MK-2866, GTx-024

Clinical data

Reliably adds lean body mass and just as reliably fails to improve physical function — the two phase 3 POWER trials found both, which is why no regulator has ever approved it.

Full Ostarine evidence review

LGD-4033 vs Ostarine: head to head

FDA status / approved use

LGD-4033

Not approved anywhere; the FDA calls SARM products unapproved drugs; banned in sport at all times

Ostarine

Never approved in any country; not a legal supplement ingredient; sold as a research chemical
Marketed for

LGD-4033

Oral muscle building without steroids

Ostarine

Muscle growth, recomposition, muscle preservation while cutting or on a GLP-1
Outcome areas

LGD-4033

Muscle / strength / lean mass; Testosterone / male hormones; Cardiovascular

Ostarine

Muscle / strength / lean mass
Evidence grade

LGD-4033

Clinical data

Ostarine

Clinical data
How it works

LGD-4033

Non-steroidal molecule that binds the androgen receptor, favoring muscle over prostate

Ostarine

Binds the androgen receptor, acting strongly in muscle and bone, weakly in prostate
Route and dosing

LGD-4033

Oral, swallowed rather than injected; once daily in trials

Ostarine

Oral, 3 mg daily in phase 3 trials
Headline human result

LGD-4033

Lean body mass up 1.21 kg vs placebo at 1.0 mg/day over 21 days in a 2013 trial of 76 men; strength unchanged

Ostarine

Beat placebo on lean body mass but not physical function in two phase 3 trials of 651 lung cancer patients
Strongest evidence

LGD-4033

Basaria phase 1 RCT, J Gerontol A 2013LGD-4033 evidence reviewPubMed 22459616

Ostarine

POWER phase 3 program, Lancet Oncol 2013Ostarine evidence reviewPubMed 23499390
Key safety signal

LGD-4033

Suppresses testosterone and cut HDL 39% in three weeks; case reports of cholestatic liver injury

Ostarine

Case reports of cholestatic liver injury; suppresses testosterone and lowers HDL cholesterol
How it is obtained

LGD-4033

Sold gray-market as a research chemical; no approved human product

Ostarine

Sold gray-market as a research chemical; no approved human product

marks a row where the two differ. “Not established” marks a cell the available evidence does not answer. Evidence grades come from our evidence matrix, which grades each molecule on the human data for the use it is marketed for.

Clinical data:
Tested in humans — but investigational, discontinued, or proven only on a surrogate marker (not the marketed outcome).

Our verdict

Both are unapproved, no regulator has ever approved any SARM for anything, and both are prohibited in sport at all times. LGD-4033's evidence is a 21-day phase 1 in 76 healthy men — 1.21 kg of lean body mass at 1.0 mg with no significant strength gain, HDL down about 39%, testosterone and SHBG suppressed — plus one phase 2 in 108 hip-fracture patients that reported a DXA lean-mass number and no functional outcome whatsoever. Ostarine (enobosarm) went much further and produced the result that defines the class: across POWER 1 and POWER 2, 651 lung-cancer patients, it beat placebo on lean body mass in both trials and on physical function in neither, with the drug arm in POWER 2 scoring 19.5% against its own placebo's 24.8%. The two have never been compared with each other, and both point at the same finding from different distances — the scanner registers more tissue and the person does not perform better.

LGD-4033 fits if

LGD-4033 is the relevant read if you want to see what happens hormonally to a healthy young man given a SARM under controlled conditions, at the only dose and duration anyone has formally measured.

Ostarine fits if

Ostarine is the relevant read if you want the phase 3 answer — the compound taken furthest through clinical development, and the trials that show why preserved lean mass is not the same as a person functioning better.

LGD-4033 vs Ostarine: common questions

Is either LGD-4033 or Ostarine FDA-approved?
No. LGD-4033 is not approved anywhere; the FDA calls SARM products unapproved drugs; banned in sport at all times. Ostarine has never been approved in any country; not a legal supplement ingredient; sold as a research chemical.
Which has stronger human evidence, LGD-4033 or Ostarine?
Neither clearly. Both have human clinical data. The key source for LGD-4033 is Basaria phase 1 RCT, J Gerontol A 2013; for Ostarine, it is POWER phase 3 program, Lancet Oncol 2013.
What are the main safety concerns with LGD-4033 and Ostarine?
LGD-4033 suppresses testosterone and cut HDL 39% in three weeks; case reports of cholestatic liver injury. For Ostarine, watch for case reports of cholestatic liver injury; suppresses testosterone and lowers HDL cholesterol.

Key studies behind each

LGD-4033

  1. Basaria S, Collins L, Dillon EL, et al. (2013). The safety, pharmacokinetics, and effects of LGD-4033, a novel nonsteroidal oral, selective androgen receptor modulator, in healthy young men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. PubMed 22459616
  2. Wen J, Syed B, Leapart J, et al. (2025). Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs) Effects on Physical Performance: A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). PubMed 39285652
  3. Barbara M, Dhingra S, Mindikoglu AL. (2020). Ligandrol (LGD-4033)-Induced Liver Injury. ACG Case Rep J. PubMed 32637435
  4. Labban H, Kwait B, Paracha A, Islam M, Kim DO. (2024). LGD-4033 and a Case of Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Exploring the Clinical Implications of Off-Label Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator Use in Healthy Adults. Cureus. PubMed 39421081

Ostarine

  1. Dias JP, Dobs AS. (2026). Will Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators Ever Reach The Clinic? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. PubMed 41670367
  2. Dalton JT, Barnette KG, Bohl CE, Hancock ML, et al. (2011). The selective androgen receptor modulator GTx-024 (enobosarm) improves lean body mass and physical function in healthy elderly men and postmenopausal women: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. PubMed 22031847
  3. Dobs AS, Boccia RV, Croot CC, Gabrail NY, et al. (2013). Effects of enobosarm on muscle wasting and physical function in patients with cancer: a double-blind, randomised controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. PubMed 23499390
  4. Crawford J, Prado CM, Johnston MA, Gralla RJ, et al. (2016). Study Design and Rationale for the Phase 3 Clinical Development Program of Enobosarm, a Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator, for the Prevention and Treatment of Muscle Wasting in Cancer Patients (POWER Trials). Curr Oncol Rep. PubMed 27138015

The full evidence reviews

Related comparisons